2025年4月6日星期日
2023年10月14日星期六
This stone piece, dating from 3700 to 4200 years ago, should be a tool used by people in the Neolithic Age to extract plant fibers. This is the first time a new understanding of the long-standing confusion about such stone artifacts has been dispelled
This stone piece, dating from 3700 to 4200 years ago, should be a tool used by people in the Neolithic Age to extract plant fibers. This is the first time a new understanding of the long-standing confusion about such stone artifacts has been dispelled.
.
此石件当是在新石器时代抽取植物纤维的工具
距今三千七百年至四千二百年之间的此石件应当是新石器时代的人抽取植物纤维的工具。这是首次破除了对此类石件的长期以来的困惑的新认知
. .
羽离子著 by Yulizi（Jian QIAN
..
.
.
（图一）
在一个去年前存在过的讨论群里，有人转介了这件甘肃省南部的临夏回族自治州的胭脂河边的齐家新石器文化遗址里出土的，距今三千七百年至四千二百年之间的石器，长十四厘米左右；被收藏于该州的县博物馆。谓研究者至今未能确认其可靠的功用。它是锄地的农具？或是武器？又或是两者都不像却用途不可知的什么东西？
我在斟酌后，思量它很可能是一种原始手工业的工具。半个多世纪前我被安排插队在长江口北侧农村的人民公社时曾使用过这一工具，只不过是铁匠用铁制作的。
秋天收获青麻时，已被拔掉麻株的空地里散布着近十张条凳。每张条凳的一头都有被用大铁钉钉牢或被用绳子捆牢在板凳面上的如同这一石器形状的小铁具。其有齿的一端露在凳头外。凳边的地上是别人拖来的已从麻杆上剥下来的成捆的长长的完整麻皮。解开捆扎后，握取一根麻皮的根部，坐在板凳上的我用左手戴的一只旧布鞋的鞋底将之压紧在带齿的刃口上；右手则抓紧麻皮而猛力地向自己身后一段段地抽拉，一直让麻皮的末梢也被抽过了这齿口。这样，原先留在麻皮上的各处枝叶和节疤就在经过此工具的齿口时，都被刮除干净了。同时，还把整片带状的麻皮抽分成了几缕。很少有人提到这种被绑牢在凳头的小工具的名称，仅依稀记得偶尔有人称之为“抽麻刀”。经过抽分的麻皮被重新地稍加捆扎后，再被拖进池塘河沟里的水中浸沤。
浸沤期视气候和水况及期间的翻捣情况而有长有短，一般十来天，有的则经月。直到麻皮外层的柔嫩表面和皮内松软的结缔组织、粘胶等都因腐烂而随流水离去；经过人工的再三漂洗和梳理，就只剩下近白色的细长闪亮的可用以纺织的美丽纤维了。
古人若用手工把麻草的外皮从其内茎上撕剥下来，效率太低。于是就已使用了此石具。只要在捆绑时把此石具右端或左端的一排齿露出木桩即可。通过此石片上的孔来穿绳捆绑主要还只是辅助性地固定之，另须再用绳把此石器的两头多层绕紧地捆绑在经过修形的树干上或粗木桩上。将此石具竖着绑还是横着绑，取决于各人的劳动习惯。绑牢后古人就能站着或坐着抽拉麻皮了。
麻草的内茎非常脆，轻轻地一折就彻底断开，且断面较平整，没有可能伤人的犬牙式的参差截面；而其外皮却很有韧性而不会被折断。所以握住一根麻草杆的根部折断之，手工拨露出其已与根部分离的茎秆，右手仍握紧链接外皮的麻根，左手带着简易的兽皮手套协同着将麻皮摁在齿口上，右手用力地不断插拉麻皮。在压力和石齿的挤划下，这根麻草的外皮就全部从内茎分离了出来。同时，麻皮还被划分成了几缕。然后把已被分离出去的细茎秆折断扔弃即可。
这样，仅仅一道工序就完成了今日劳动时先要分离麻皮和麻秆，然后再把麻皮划分成几条细缕的这两道工序的全部工作。因为古代野生麻比较细矮；而今日的黄麻、苎麻等等的都是人工育种的，长得十分高大粗壮。越粗壮，其外皮的围径越大，纤维产量可以成倍地增加。麻越高，同一个土地单位面积出产的纤维量也就越高。所以在后世，不少时候会把剥麻皮及与清刮并剖划麻皮分成两道工序来做，以减轻劳动的力度，而使之在女工等能够付出的体力范围之内。
用绳或用打结接长的麻皮把一堆剥下的麻皮的根部逐一穿札住以后，扛着这一捆捆的麻皮到小河塘边，将之扔进水里以浸泡沤烂。把它们牵系在河边的木桩或树干上，不使随水流飘走。隔几天过来用长长的竹竿或木杆打压几下以促进沤洗的进程。
既然能抽拉麻皮以助获其纤维，那么似乎就也能抽树皮以取纤维呀；说起来貌似可以，但实际情况则基本不然！的确至近世还有未进入现代社会的野居之人砍割若干种树的嫩枝，剥其嫩皮以搓成细绳来编结衣服，再在这样的衣服的小孔里插札草叶或兽毛鸟羽以保暖的。东南亚还有捶打浸泡棕榈树等的皮以取其纤维，用之编织衣裤或搓绳的。其绳更耐盐渍和腐蚀，而多被海船购用。但树皮纤维毕竟太粗太硬又量少；抽取很困难而耗力费时太多。何况石片的强度有限，用以抽拉树皮或后世经人工培育的高粗之麻，会损坏石齿甚至折断石麻刀。而属于草类的上古野麻，用此石具的两端，可以很轻松容易地分离出其细茎和外皮。
麻草的外皮皆细腻柔软，其皮所含的纤维又很长。野生麻的种类繁多，遍布全球；古人可以随地取用。即使高度只有两三尺的矮麻草，也可以被抽拉出上好的纤维。这里不赘述获取麻纤维的其它几种方法；而仅仅叙述可以依靠石质麻刀的劳动方式。
我以前已经注意到了甘南地区出土的新石器时代的玉琮与长江口的新石器时代的青墩遗址出土之玉琮的形制属于同一类型；那么，遍生各种麻的青墩地区的“抽麻刀”也未必不可以与甘南的属于同一类型。只是青墩地区不产石料，先前的考古发掘也没有见到麻刀类的物品。但石料和石具，是可以获自外地的；青墩出土有石器和玉件，已证明了这一点。没有挖到石麻刀，不等于青墩古人没有使用之。自然，古青墩人也可能会采用其他的抽取麻纤维的生产方式。
（图二）
.
图二的是见于一藏家的一件类似的石制工具。但下面图三里的这件虽然类似，却不是。图三之件的豁口并非乱砸造成，而是人为切割出来的。
（图三）
图一所示的石器，由于对之的收藏记录粗率而含糊；所以还需要用电镜对其孔洞等进行观测和与其它石件上的包括已确认的在上古石器上的各类制孔法的样品进行严格的比对与推析；以及使用能发现微量金属元素的高灵敏度的光谱仪等等仪器，对其刃槽和孔内壁的削痕处等进行检测；以帮助鉴定此件。
今日甘肃的气候已经远比新石器时代该地的气候要寒冷得多。那时，这一纬度之北的东方，还生活着犀牛群。而更为北方的地方，还有长毛象等。那时到处都有大量的可作为纺织物原料的野生麻类植物；而今日只有在人工栽培的情况下才可能有大面积的麻田了；所以制作麻类纤维等的手工纺织业，在这一地区绝迹已久。如果甘南的胭脂河流域出土的这一石器，确是上古时手工纺织业所用的工具。那么，对于今日的考古学家们和文物研究者们之所以暂时还不知道这一石器之功用的原因，也就不难理解了。反过来说，如果确认了这一工具的用途，则可助以推测上古时代的物产与环境等。
（结束）
.
2023年4月13日星期四
(II) The catalogue index of my Chinese blog articles about Zhang Jian and my proposal to apply a series of modern industrial cultural relics and remains in Nantong-Tangzha for World Heritage
The catalogue index of my Chinese blog articles about Zhang Jian and my proposal to apply a series of modern industrial cultural relics and remains in Nantong-Tangzha for World Heritage (II)
(Second
part • articles
41～107）
我的研究张謇及倡议南通-唐闸近代工业文化遗产申报世遗的中文博文等的目录索引(下)
（2011年11月～2022年7月）
（下 • 第41～107篇）
By Yulizi (Jian QIAN)
.
%E2%80%99s%20research%20in%20Zhang%20Jian%20and%20%E2%80%A6into%20the%20world%20heritage%20list-%E4%B8%89%E6%96%B0%E6%B1%A0%E6%B5%B4%E5%AE%A4%E5%BC%84%E5%A0%82%E5%8F%A3%E5%87%8F%E9%87%8F.jpg)
This index is used to introduce 107
articles of more than 200 of my blog posts or short essays, answers, notes and
so on, that I have published on Sina blog, Weibo, WeChat, etc. from November
2011 to August 2022. Among them, the blue phrases (sometimes
discolored) which are not enclosed in brackets are the titles of Sina blog
articles, with only 43 serial numbers; Because any posts with different
publication dates but repetitive content are not included in the statistical
range.
As far as the remains and relics of modern industry and commerce
of Nantong Tangzha, etc. in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China
are concerned, other comrades have investigated and studied a little earlier
than me. However, after studying the profound significance of Nantong's modern
industrial culture and the conditions, evaluation and actual conditions of the
world's cultural heritage, I was the first to put forward the opinion of
applying Nantong-Tangzha's modern industrial cultural heritage to the world
cultural heritage list, and for in-depth research. In 2002, the book "Research
on Nantong Tourism Development Strategy" planned by Mr. Shi Jing-qian,
Secretary-General and Vice-Chairman of Nantong Political Consultative
Conference, was started to be compiled in research. I as a member of his
research team, finally completed a report on the topic in October of the
following year. My report under the title of the "Research on the
Branding and Development of Nantong Tourism Resources" are composed
with seven chapters with more than 50,000 characters is used as a part of the
book. The sixth chapter of my report is "New Suggestions for the
Protection and Utilization of Modern Communities in Nantong". The
purpose stated in that suggestion is to "prepare and try to declare the
original Dasheng enterprise group community, the modern community of Nantong,
to the United Nations as a world cultural heritage".
This is a bold but serious initiative that has been proposed for
the first time in the theoretical and industry circles after my careful
research and thoughtful thinking. The three sections specifically discussed in
this sixth chapter are "Theoretical Possibility of Registering
Nantong's Modern Community in the World Cultural Heritage List",
"The Industrial Community in Irvine, UK and Its Application for World
Cultural Heritage as reference"; and "Preparatory work for
Nantong to declare a world heritage project".
Because this research can also be classified as one of the
"2003 Nantong Economic and Social Development Hotspot Issues
Research" of the Nantong Philosophy and Social Sciences Federation, the
Nantong Philosophy and Social Sciences Federation announced on December 16,
2003 The evaluation certificate and the second prize were awarded to my
scientific research report which examined this opinion. The book chief edited by
Mr. Shi Jing-qian, which included my long report, has been published but the
publishing date was delayed to March 2004 due to errors in the compilation and
printing of the catalogue, when It was officially published by the China
Literature and History Publishing House, Beijing.
In November 2007, another research achievement, “The Research
Report on the Protection and Utilization of Tangzha - Nantong Modern Industrial
Community Heritage” as the key project of Nantong philosophy and social
science research "Eleventh Five Year Plan" social science fund, which
report I presided over, was basically completed. The analysis on the
application for world heritage was enriched and the requirements were
increasingly systematized. In 2008, the Publicity Department of the municipal
Party committee selected several scientific research achievements and compiled
them into a booklet, which was distributed to the relevant departments of the
city for recommendation; This report chief compiled by me on the achievements
of the key projects of the social science foundation of the 11th five year plan
is in the forefront of being recommended. Since then, I have revised,
supplemented and reprinted this more than 156 page report several times.
Moreover, my related monographs, academic papers and professional
reports were not included. However, due to lack of time, it needs to be
completed in the future; It is also possible to print all the blog articles and
attach all the screenshots to record my efforts to study and promote the
application of this place for World Heritage in the past 20 years.
All the blog posts and so on are only a tiny amount, but they are
also meaningful, which are based on my research in
the nearly past four decades on the local region and
Zhang Jian with his business; A number of writings of different
lengths that have not been included in this index in
time and are not convenient to be disclosed on a large scale are also valuable.
Moreover, my related monographs, academic
papers and professional reports were not included. There is not enough time, so
it needs to be completed in the future; It should also be possible to print the
full texts of all the blog articles and attach all the screenshots of them
(except for those in the circle and in the group who have spoken with me and
clearly want me to display their names and dialogues, all other people's names on
the screenshots will be mosaiced and may not record their words) to
record my efforts over the past 20 years to study and promote the application
of this place for World Heritage.
The eight Arabic numerals in front of each article indicate the
date on which the article was published on the Internet. The countermeasures,
research reports, opinions, suggestions, etc. in this catalogue are often
completed many years before this date and submitted to relevant parties.
0000000000000000000000000000000
41. 20170205 〔去年派学生往各地找过张謇海图〕（微信）。
42. 20170319 〔议张謇大生论坛 （微信张謇·公众群）〕。
44. 20170526 〔《我与大丰的三份情》一文勾忆起我多年前的建议 （微信张謇·公众群）〕。
45. 20170530 〔释“南通的始点在唐家闸”（微信张謇·公众群）〕。 .
47. 20171202 〔想参观唐闸及忆申遗事（地方文史发展群）〕。
49. 20180421 Nantong, an undervalued
important node at maritime silk road: Interview with Qian Jian, Professor
at Department of History, School of Liberal Arts, Nantong University. 南通，被低估的海上丝路重要节点——专访历史学教授钱健（转）（新浪博客。若此旧版打不开，请点开此下的20210819重发的新版）。
20180418、20210819 Nantong,
an undervalued important node at maritime silk road：Interview with Qian Jian,
Professor in History. 被低估的海上丝路重要节点：南通-- 专访通大文学院历史系教授钱健(转发) (新浪博客)。.
50. 20180504〔答问是否见未志记中国许多大城市却标印唐家闸的地图 （微信答友）〕。
51. 20180606〔吸取过去市文物处等请外地两三个研究所做申遗报告的教训（微信答友）〕。
52. 20180625〔唐闸升级为古镇了？（微信公众参与）〕。
53. 20180709-10〔转发情深君的唐闸照片并说明谁最早提出工业遗产申遗及工作要求（微信公众参与）〕。
56. 20181108 〔应答对唐闸近代工业遗产等的网评 （微信朋友圈）〕。
57. 20190105 〔啬公的葬仪 （地方文史发展群）〕
20210921 Asked to
Discuss on the School Anthem of Nantong University Which Has Been Promulgated.
Past Work Has Become History. 应约对南通大学校歌的讨论（新浪博客）。 .
59. 20190204 〔回复《谁来保护百年工业遗迹，小海宝昌纱厂》 （濠滨论坛）〕。
60. 20190204 Please protect
the industrial relics at the beginning of the Last century such as Xiaohai
Baochang Yarn Mill and Dingyan Textile Mill ASAP 希望能保护小海宝昌纱厂和丁堰织布厂等近代工业遗存 （新浪博客）。
61. 20190206 My speech about the Tangzha industrial heritage
“对唐闸历史工业名镇保护与申遗的建议”座谈会的发言（新浪博客）。
62. 20110418、20190208 Former
president Chu Min-Yi’s absurd life 先校长褚民谊的癫狂人生（新浪博客）。.
63. 20190427 〔张謇为求学和进学而“冒籍”，是僵政窳败之罪 （微信答友）〕。
64. 20190504 〔答复所闻唐闸东工房属于职工宿舍涉嫌造假事 （微信答友）〕。
65. 20190615 〔对啬公功业的评价 （地方文史发展群） 〕。
66. 20190619 〔唐闸近代工业文化社区遭随意曲解、借用开发而被肆意摧残了 （微信公众参与） 〕。
67. 20190925-26 〔说唐闸拆真建假和建议唐闸南通仿莱茵河游等 （河口微信群）〕 。
68. 20191008 〔韩立明到泰后从头越，遂修成正果 （地方文史发展群）〕。
69. 20191109 〔汪树堂兄弟起头请重审杨乃武与小白菜及朝政 （地方文史发展群）〕。
70. 20191113 〔对伶工学社的新的期待 （濠滨论坛）〕。
71. 20191113 〔答问张謇在南通城开通公交的历史 （地方文史发展群）〕。
73. 20191128〔简议章开沅先生的高望和代表性 （微信留言）〕。
74. 20200108〔答述自己的唐闸申遗、十八里河口和陈桥地区史、张謇研究的眼下安排 （河口群）〕。
75. 20200316〔近代南通人在上海（地方文史发展群）〕。
76. 20200329、20200417 Zhang Jian matchmaking for Lv Bicheng to
marry Zhu Zongyuan. 张謇曾为吕碧城作媒使嫁诸宗元 （新浪博客）。
77. 20200403〔我与中国地学会及抢救白雅雨的故居 （地方文史发展群）〕。
78. 20200404〔长期无视人文历史的遗存而疯狂拆建 （地方文史发展群）〕。.
80. 20200616-17〔与我微信互聊唐闸申遗事等 （微信笔谈）〕。
81. 20200617 〔经办者们多自以为是地想体现其肤浅认知中的世遗模样 （濠滨论坛）〕。
82. 20200618 〔我倡议申遗是希望能永久性地保护文化遗产而不为自己 （在《对〈江海晚报〉载〈南通唐闸离世界…》的评论）〕。
83. 20200618 〔旧工房群和旧街多拆光而另建新区致失珍贵条件 （微信公众参与群）〕。
84. 20200703Answering
Professor Cai's Question Why I Sigh 答蔡教授问为何感叹 （新浪博客）。
85. 20200703 〔答文化遗产的破坏者被定性为犯罪吗？ （地方文史发展群）〕。
86. 20200705 〔诈用申遗之腐败行径摧毁了申遗的基础 • 之一、之二 （微信致友）〕。
87. 20200718 〔能当真保护历史性街区建筑的官员少之又少（微信聊友）〕。
89. 20200917〔在整理五年前答大生档案申报亚洲记忆名录的录音稿 （地方文史发展群） 〕。
90. 20210525 〔近二十年前我就开始提醒南通-唐闸的申遗要尽量赶在日本军舰岛之前 （微信朋友圈）〕。
91. 20210611 〔2021年6月11日参加本南通市“章开沅先生追思会”时钱健的发言 （20210629写发给小许）〕。
92. 20210806 〔我是从国人主导的在近现代的社会变迁、文化更俗以及政治改革等等所达到的高度上来探讨南通堪称近代第一城之论的 （地方文史发展群）〕。
94 . 20210904 〔头等大事是补做完成对唐闸和濠南两街区的精确的测绘工作 （微信朋友圈）〕。
95. 20211026 〔商人的贪欲和官员的逢迎合力，清空了彼等所需的任何一块地皮上的建筑（江海文化群）〕
96. 20220106 〔赞张炽康文兼忆抄碑和保德肋撒堂事又答胡泓石问郁芑生像等的几节留言 （江海文化群）〕。
97. 20220114 〔几句说袁文 （地方文史发展群）〕。
98. 20220116 〔在预研究和预评估后斟拟的关于张謇的有研究价值和社会意义的两个学术暨科研项目的选题（微信供友人参考）〕。
100. 20220218 〔略言骆先生考张謇是否拟清帝辞位诏之文 （微信答文）〕。
101. 20220528-0529 〔章先生给我们和未来人留下了一系列的史学遗产，遗泽深远。(微信朋友圈点赞和向看一看推荐茅海建和张绪武纪念章开沅的两文) 〕。
102. 2000709 The
catalogue index of Sina-blog articles by Yulizi (QIAN Jian)’s research in Zhang
Jian and declaring the modern industrial cultural society over Nantong-Tangzha
into the world heritage list 羽离子(钱健)研撰张謇及南通-唐镇近代工业文化遗产申报世遗的新浪博文的目录索引 （新浪博客）。
103. 20220710 〔囗囗基本停止囗囗囗囗囗囗囗的原因 （微信群友）〕。
104. 20220713 〔保护唐闸和申遗变成了一场浑水摸鱼的假面舞会的狂欢（在20220710所发稿上的补写件。河口群、张謇·公众群、地方文史发展群）〕。
105. 20220731 〔简告为何申世文遗的南通-唐闸工遗的拆建损益等不可能蒙混过世遗委组织的严格而精准的科学检测 （旧雨群）、后转河口群）〕。
106. 20220807-202208XX 〔答复南通-唐闸工遗申请世文遗之事的几篇信简（河口群、及待转发）〕。
107. \
.
（end）
.
.
(I) The catalogue index of my Chinese blog articles about Zhang Jian and my proposal to apply a series of modern industrial cultural relics and remains in Nantong-Tangzha for World Heritage
The catalogue index of my Chinese blog articles about Zhang Jian and my proposal to apply a series of modern industrial cultural relics and remains in Nantong-Tangzha for World Heritage (I)
(First part • introduction,
articles 1～40）
《研撰张謇及南通-唐闸近代工业文化遗产申报世遗的新浪博文的目录索引》(上)
（2011年11月～2022年7月）
（上• 含说明、第1~40篇）
By Yulizi (Jian QIAN)
2022年8月编
%E7%A0%94%E6%92%B0%E5%BC%A0%E8%AC%87%E5%8F%8A%E5%8D%97%E9%80%9A-%E5%94%90%E9%97%B8%E5%B7%A5%E4%B8%9A%E8%BF%91%E4%BB%A3%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%E9%81%97%E4%BA%A7%E7%94%B3%E6%8A%A5%E4%B8%96%E9%81%97%E7%9A%84%E6%96%B0%E6%B5%AA%E5%8D%9A%E6%96%87%E7%9A%84%E7%9B%AE%E5%BD%95%E7%B4%A2%E5%BC%95%20(%E5%94%90%E9%97%B8%E5%90%84%E5%AE%9E%E4%B8%9A%E5%85%A8%E6%99%AF)%E5%87%8F%E9%87%8F.jpg) |
This index is used to introduce 107 articles of more than 200 of my blog posts or short essays, answers, notes and so on, that I have published on Sina blog, Weibo, WeChat, etc. from November 2011 to August 2022. Among them, the blue phrases (sometimes discolored) which are not enclosed in brackets are the titles of Sina blog articles, with only 43 serial numbers; Because any posts with different publication dates but repetitive content are not included in the statistical range.
As far as the remains and relics of
modern industry and commerce of Nantong Tangzha, etc. in the late Qing Dynasty
and the early Republic of China are concerned, other comrades have investigated
and studied a little earlier than me. However, after studying the profound
significance of Nantong's modern industrial culture and the conditions,
evaluation and actual conditions of the world's cultural heritage, I was the
first to put forward the opinion of applying Nantong-Tangzha's modern
industrial cultural heritage to the world cultural heritage list, and for in-depth
research. In 2002, the book "Research on Nantong Tourism Development
Strategy" planned by Mr. Shi Jing-qian, Secretary-General and
Vice-Chairman of Nantong Political Consultative Conference, was started to be
compiled in research. I as a member of his research team, finally completed a
report on the topic in October of the following year. My report under the title
of the "Research on the Branding and Development of Nantong Tourism
Resources" are composed with seven chapters with more than 50,000
characters is used as a part of the book. The sixth chapter of my report is
"New Suggestions for the Protection and Utilization of Modern
Communities in Nantong". The purpose stated in that suggestion is to
"prepare and try to declare the original Dasheng enterprise group
community, the modern community of Nantong, to the United Nations as a world
cultural heritage".
This is a bold but serious initiative that has been proposed for
the first time in the theoretical and industry circles after my careful
research and thoughtful thinking. The three sections specifically discussed in
this sixth chapter are "Theoretical Possibility of Registering
Nantong's Modern Community in the World Cultural Heritage List",
"The Industrial Community in Irvine, UK and Its Application for World
Cultural Heritage as reference"; and "Preparatory work for
Nantong to declare a world heritage project".
Because this research can also be
classified as one of the "2003 Nantong Economic and Social Development
Hotspot Issues Research" of the Nantong Philosophy and Social Sciences
Federation, the Nantong Philosophy and Social Sciences Federation announced on
December 16, 2003 The evaluation certificate and the second prize were awarded
to my scientific research report which examined this opinion. The book chief edited
by Mr. Shi Jing-qian, which included my long report, has been published but the
publishing date was delayed to March 2004 due to errors in the compilation and
printing of the catalogue, when It was officially published by the China
Literature and History Publishing House, Beijing.
In November 2007, another research
achievement, “The Research Report on the Protection and Utilization of
Tangzha - Nantong Modern Industrial Community Heritage” as the key project
of Nantong philosophy and social science research "Eleventh Five Year
Plan" social science fund, which report I presided over, was basically completed.
The analysis on the application for world heritage was enriched and the
requirements were increasingly systematized. In 2008, the Publicity Department
of the municipal Party committee selected several scientific research
achievements and compiled them into a booklet, which was distributed to the
relevant departments of the city for recommendation; This report chief compiled
by me on the achievements of the key projects of the social science foundation
of the 11th five year plan is in the forefront of being recommended. Since
then, I have revised, supplemented and reprinted this more than 156 page report
several times.
Moreover, my related monographs,
academic papers and professional reports were not included. However, due to
lack of time, it needs to be completed in the future; It is also possible to
print all the blog articles and attach all the screenshots to record my efforts
to study and promote the application of this place for World Heritage in the
past 20 years.
All the blog posts and so on are only a
tiny amount, but they are also
meaningful, which are based on my research in
the nearly past four decades on the local region and
Zhang Jian with his business; A number of writings of different
lengths that have not been included in this index in
time and are not convenient to be disclosed on a large scale are also valuable.
Moreover, my related monographs, academic
papers and professional reports were not included. There is not enough time, so
it needs to be completed in the future; It should also be possible to print the
full texts of all the blog articles and attach all the screenshots of them
(except for those in the circle and in the group who have spoken with me and
clearly want me to display their names and dialogues, all other people's names on
the screenshots will be mosaiced and may not record their words) to
record my efforts over the past 20 years to study and promote the application
of this place for World Heritage.
The eight Arabic numerals in front of each article indicate the date on which the article was published on the Internet. The countermeasures, research reports, opinions, suggestions, etc. in this catalogue are often completed many years before this date and submitted to relevant parties.
0000000000000000000000000000000
1. 20110222 〔袁世凯银元与张謇和雕刻师鲁•乔治 （人人日志）〕。
2. 20110303 〔南通大学钟秀校区所在地的历史变迁 （人人日志）〕。.
6. 20120209 把上年8月1日给市文管会转文化局办公室递报省文物局关于把唐闸-南通近代工业文化遗址列为国家财政拨款研护大遗址并申报世遗名录的立项申请表的副本转发张慎欣先生〕。.
7. 20120519 〔啬公首释用铎是谕诸生当趋时与知警以勉力向学之意 （QQ空间）〕。.
10. 20121228 The protection work
of this part of Nantong modern industrial community in China is very good. I hope
to expand the protection. The attached is my reply. 中国南通近代工业社区这部分的保护工作很好而望扩展之顺附答话（新浪博客）。
11. 20110313 Proposition for Emergently
Protecting St. Teresa Church Buildings Which Are being Demolished by the Local
Authority 提议保护即将被拆的德肋撒堂建筑
（2005年8月15日给市政府）（新浪博客）。
12. 20130331、20150808 A proposal to
teardown the new road towards the south workers' housing and change it back to
the old way. 建议拆掉唐闸南工房边的新路而改回旧路 （新浪博客）。
15. 20131018 A Dream of Kin
Taek-Yong 金沧江的梦 （新浪博客）。 .
16. 20131020Review of the Paper "The
Lost Drafts of Kim Chang-gang" Presented by Professor Kim
Hongyong in the Colloquium. 〔評應金洪永的《滄江金澤榮의逸稿》（人人日志）〕。.
17. 20131021 The Drama School Has Been
Repaired, Praising the Local Government of Nantong for Its Protecting the
Cultural Heritages
伶工学社修复，赞南通市政府对文化遗产的保护与承传 （新浪博客。上传iask爱问共享资料）。
18 20140220 〔韩国金沧江的汉学成就 （上传iask爱问共享资料）〕。
19. 20140722 信答唐闸历史文化遗存事并再吁完整而原真地保护之 （新浪博客）。
20. 20140727 Mayor Zhang Guohua
dealt with problems on site to strengthen the protection and utilization of
Tangzha town 张国华赴唐闸古镇就保护利用现场办公以求增强合力……（新浪博客）。
21. 20141013 MOTTO与校训及试答书
Mottos, School Instructions and an Answering Paper （新浪博客）。
22. 20141027 1
Comparing And Commenting
Tangzha-Nantong Industrial Culture Community in
China And the …in Modern Times 比论唐闸-南通近代工业文化社区 第一部分 Part（新浪博客）。
23. 20141028 比论唐闸-南通近代工业文化社区 第二部分 Part 2 （新浪博客）。
24. 20141028 比论唐闸-南通近代工业文化社区 第三部分 Part 3 （新浪博客）。
25. 20150425 〔答民国时南通学院想改南通大学事 （微信）〕。
26. 20150630 Celebrating Mr.
Zhang Kaiyuan's ninetieth birthday 庆贺章开沅先生九秩华诞 按转周锡瑞：问学章开沅先生（新浪博客）。 ..
27. 20150811 They are fake historic
worker's living quarters rebuilt with changes！〔重造假工房（羽离子的QQ空间）〕。
28. 20150812 It should not be to
“rebuild” a theme park! 〔不是让“重建”主题公园 （濠滨论坛）〕。.
29. 20150815 〔关于唐闸近代工业文明遗址保护事的答议 （新浪博文留言）〕。.
30. 20150902 〔读尤灿所转吳晓波《七月•纪念张謇：最“失败”的状元》文而留言 （微信）〕。
31. 20150903 〔与议拆唐闸憩亭等事 （微信）〕。.
.33. 20150930 〔议近期狂拆唐闸的高岸街 （微信）〕。
34. 20160311 Four shot letters of mine: criticizing the devastating impacts on Nant ong's declaration for World Heritage 短札四件：对南通申遗的毁灭性影响 （新浪博客、人人日志）。
35. 20160329
My speech at the Discussing “how to establish effective
channels for public participation to supervising and restraining the protection
project of Tangzha industrial heritage” 在“完善领导机制、扩大公众参与、遵循规章保护：关于对唐闸历史工业名镇保护与申遗的建议”座谈会上的发言（新'i'博客。若此旧版打不开，请点开此下的20170710重发文）。
20170710 My
speech at … 在“完善领导机制、扩大公众参与、遵循规章保护：关于对唐闸历史工业名镇保护与申遗的建议”座谈会上的发言（新浪博客）。 .
36. 20160422
My Proposals of Designing Nantong University Logo and the Badges
Catalog for Reference 当初对设计南通大学校徽的献议及资参的徽谱（新浪博客。20161009上传百度文库）。 .
37. 20160507 〔南通工业文化遗产之殇：赞南通狼之文 （濠滨论坛）〕。
39. 20161111 〔唐闸实际上已正在成为一个今日干部为自己主政而造的纪念园 （微信唐闸公众）〕。
40. 20161227-28 〔讲唐闸的英国模式 （地方文史发展群）〕 。
(To be continued in the next article)
.